Financials threaten to undermine the functioning of emissions markets

  • Kaldor, N. Speculation and Economic Stability. Rev. Econ. Stud. 7, 1–27 (1939).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Keynes, J. M. Treatise on Money (Macmillan, 1930).

  • Ekeland, I., Lautier, D. & Villeneuve, B. Hedging pressure and speculation in commodity markets. Econ. Theory 68, 83–123 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brunnermeier, M. K., Sockin, M. & Xiong, W. China’s model of managing the financial system. Rev. Econ. Stud. 89, 3115–3153 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goldstein, I. & Yang, L. Commodity financialization and information transmission. J. Finance 77, 2613–2667 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Martin, I. W. R. & Papadimitriou, D. Sentiment and speculation in a market with heterogeneous beliefs. Am. Econ. Rev. 112, 2465–2517 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pirrong, C. Market Oversight for Cap-and-Trade: Efficiently Regulating the Carbon Derivatives Market Policy Brief 09–04 (The Brookings Institution, Energy Security Initiative, 2009). An overview of what commodity derivatives are, why they are used, how they are traded, the abuses they are subject to (manipulation, excessive speculation) and how to constrain those abuses with a focus on carbon markets.

  • Monast, J. Climate change and financial markets: regulating the trade side of cap and trade. Environ. Law Rep. 40, 51–65 (2010).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Fattouh, B., Kilian, L. & Mahadeva, L. The role of speculation in oil markets: what have we learned so far? Energy J. 34, 7–33 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cheng, I.-H. & Xiong, W. Financialization of commodity markets. Annu. Rev. Financ. Econ. 6, 419–41 (2014). A literature review on how financial investors affect risk sharing and information discovery in commodity markets, discussing the implications of financialization and ways for improving assessment of these mechanisms.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kilian, L. & Murphy, D. P. The role of inventories and speculative trading in the global market for crude oil. J. Appl. Econ. 29, 454–78 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Basak, S. & Pavlova, A. A model of financialization of commodities. J Finance 71, 1511–1556 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Knittel, C. R. & Pindyck, R. S. The simple economics of commodity price speculation. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 8, 85–110 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Boyd, N. E., Harris, J. H. & Li, B. An update on speculation and financialization in commodity markets. J. Commod. Mark. 10, 91–104 (2018). A literature review on financialization of commodity markets and the various roles of speculation, also using the Working T-index.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sheppard, D. Hedge funds and Wall St banks cash in on carbon market’s revival. Financial Times (7 September 2018).

  • Sheppard, D. Carbon trading: the ‘one-way’ bet for hedge funds. Financial Times (23 August 2020).

  • Buli, N., Abnett, K. & Twidale, S. EU carbon price hits record 50 euros per tonne on route to climate target. Reuters (4 May 2021).

  • Prices in the world’s biggest carbon market are soaring. The Economist (27 February 2021).

  • Getting to Net Zero: The Vital Role of Global Carbon Markets (Institute of International Finance, 2021).

  • Putting Carbon Markets to Work on the Path to Net Zero (McKinsey & Company, 2021).

  • Jeszke, R. & Lizak, S. Reflections on the mechanisms to protect against formation of price bubble in the EU ETS market. Environ. Protect. Nat. Resour. 32, 8–17 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Bouleau, N. Limits to growth and stochastics. Real World Econ. Rev. 60, 92–106 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Berta, N., Gautherat, E. & Gun, O. Transactions in the European carbon market: a bubble of compliance in a whirlpool of speculation. Cambridge J. Econ. 41, 575–593 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Smith, T. Financialisation of Nature SRE Discussion Paper 08/2021 (Vienna University of Economics and Business, 2021).

  • Germain, M., van Steenberghe, V. & Magnus, A. Optimal policy with tradable and bankable pollution permits: taking the market microstructure into account. J. Public Econ. Theory 6, 737–757 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Colla, P., Germain, M. & van Steenberghe, V. Environmental policy and speculation on markets for emission permits. Economica 79, 152–182 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Borghesi, S. & Flori, A. EU ETS facets in the net: structure and evolution of the EU ETS network. Energy Econ. 75, 602–635 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cantillon, E. & Slechten, A. Information aggregation in emissions markets with abatement. Ann. Econ. Stat. 132, 53–79 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cludius, J. & Betz, R. The role of banks in EU emissions trading. Energy J. 41, 275–299 (2020). An empirical investigation of the role of banks in the EU ETS, documenting how they act as intermediaries and hedging counterparties for compliance entities.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Friedrich, M., Mauer, E.-M., Pahle, M. & Tietjen, O. From Fundamentals to Financial Assets: The Evolution of Understanding Price Formation in the EU ET (Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, 2020). A synthesis of the empirical literature on price formation in the EU ETS, highlighting three key dimensions (demand-side fundamentals, regulatory intervention, and financial trading) and the need to shed light on how they interact.

  • Role of Derivatives in Carbon Markets Report (International Swaps and Derivatives Association, 2021).

  • Carbon Trading in the European Union: An Economic Assessment of Market Functioning in 2021 (Oxera Consulting, 2022).

  • Angel, J. J. & McCabe, D. M. The ethics of speculation. J. Bus. Ethics 90, 277–286 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hart, O. D. & Kreps, D. M. Price destabilizing speculation. J. Polit. Econ. 94, 927–952 (1986).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Newbery, D. M. G. When do futures destabilize spot prices? Int. Econ. Rev. 28, 291–297 (1987).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • De Long, J. B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L. H. & Waldmann, R. J. Noise trader risk in financial markets. J. Polit. Econ. 98, 703–738 (1990).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sockin, M. & Xiong, W. Informational frictions and commodity markets. J. Finance LXX, 2063–2098 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • de Perthuis, C. & Trotignon, R. Governance of CO2 markets: lessons from the EU ETS. Energy Policy 75, 100–106 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grosjean, G., Acworth, W., Flachsland, C. & Marschinski, R. After monetary policy, climate policy: is delegation the key to EU ETS reform? Clim. Policy 16, 1–25 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Koch, N., Grosjean, G., Fuss, S. & Edenhofer, O. Politics matters: regulatory events as catalysts for price formation under cap-and-trade. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 78, 121–139 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Salant, S. W. What ails the European Union’s emissions trading system? J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 80, 6–19 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Final Report: Emission Allowances and Associated Derivatives (European Securities and Markets Authority, 2022). A report on the functioning of the EU ETS and its different market segments (auctions, allowances trading, derivatives trading), providing quantitative analyses and recommendations for improving market data provision and monitoring.

  • Abrell, J., Cludius, J., Lehmann, S., Schleich, J. & Betz, R. Corporate emissions-trading behaviour during the first decade of the EU ETS. Environ. Resour. Econ. 83, 47–83 (2022). An empirical analysis of the determinants of trading behavior in the EU ETS based on relevant trader characteristics.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rannou, Y. & Barneto, P. Futures trading with information asymmetry and OTC predominance: another look at the volume/volatility relations in the European carbon markets. Energy Econ. 53, 159–174 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Emission Trading and Regulation of Financial Markets (German Environment Agency, 2022).

  • Martin, R., Muûls, M. & Wagner, U. J. The impact of the European Union emissions trading scheme on regulated firms: what is the evidence after ten years? Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 10, 129–148 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zaklan, A. Coase and cap-and-trade: evidence on the independence property from the European carbon market. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy (in the press).

  • Trading Activities and Strategies in the European Carbon Market (German Environment Agency, 2022). A report providing a quantitative analysis of physical allowance trading behavior in the EU ETS with a focus on the energy and financial sectors.

  • Schopp, A. & Neuhoff, K. The Role of Hedging in Carbon Markets Discussion Paper 1271 (DIW Berlin, 2013).

  • Quemin, S. & Trotignon, R. Emissions trading with rolling horizons. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 125, 104099 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tietjen, O., Lessmann, K. & Pahle, M. Hedging and temporal permit issuances in cap-and-trade programs: the market stability reserve under risk aversion. Resour. Energy Econ. 63, 101214 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rannou, Y., Boutabba, M. A. & Barneto, P. Are green bond and carbon markets in Europe complements or substitutes? Insights from the activity of power firms. Energy Econ. 104, 105651 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Functioning of the European Carbon Market in 2020 Pursuant to Articles 10(5) and 21(2) of Directive 2003/87/EC (as amended by Directive 2009/29/EC and Directive (EU) 2018/410) (European Commission, 2021).

  • 2022 State of the EU ETS Report (European Roundtable on Climate Change and Sustainable Transition, 2022).

  • Hahn, R. W. & Stavins, R. N. The effect of allowance allocations on cap-and-trade system performance. J. Law Econ. 54, S267–S294 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Martin, R., Muûls, M. & Wagner, U. J. in Emissions Trading as a Policy Instrument: Evaluation and Prospects (eds Gronwald, M. & Hintermann, B.) Ch. 9 (MIT Press, 2015).

  • Ellerman, A. D., Marcantonini, C. & Zaklan, A. The European Union emissions trading system: ten years and counting. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 10, 89–107 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Directive 2003/87/EC Establishing a System for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading Within the Union, Decision (EU) 2015/1814 Concerning the Establishment and Operation of a Market Stability Reserve for the Union Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading Scheme and Regulation (EU) 2015/757 (European Commission, 2021).

  • Burtraw, D. & McCormack, K. Consignment auctions of free emissions allowances. Energy Policy 107, 337–344 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • MacKenzie, I. A. The evolution of pollution auctions. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 16, 1–24 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Venmans, F. The effect of allocation above emissions and price uncertainty on abatement investments under the EU ETS. J. Clean. Prod. 126, 595–606 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Baudry, M., Faure, A. & Quemin, S. Emissions trading with transaction costs. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 108, 102468 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cheng, I.-H. & Xiong, W. Why do hedgers trade so much? J. Legal Stud. 43, 183–207 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gerlagh, R., Heijmans, R. J. R. K. & Rosendahl, K. E. Endogenous emission caps always produce a green paradox. Econ. Policy 36, 485–522 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Perino, G. Carbon market design and self-fulfilling prophecies. SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4243350 (2022).

  • Kollenberg, S. & Taschini, L. Dynamic supply adjustment and banking under uncertainty in an emissions trading scheme: the market stability reserve. Eur. Econ. Rev. 118, 213–226 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Perino, G., Willner, M., Quemin, S. & Pahle, M. The European Union emissions trading system market stability reserve: does it stabilize or destabilize the market? Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 16, 338–345 (2022). A literature review and policy brief on current market design challenges and the Market Stability Reserve in the EU ETS.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Quemin, S. Raising climate ambition in emissions trading systems: the case of the EU ETS and the 2021 review. Resour. Energy Econ. 68, 101300 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Afonin, A., Bredin, D., Cuthbertson, K., Muckley, C. & Nitzsche, D. Carbon portfolio management. Int. J. Finance Econ. 23, 349–361 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pardo, Á. Carbon and inflation. Financ. Res. Lett. 38, 101519 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Demiralay, S., Gencer, H. G. & Bayraci, S. Carbon credit futures as an emerging asset: hedging, diversification and downside risks. Energy Econ. 113, 106196 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jin, J., Han, L., Wu, L. & Zeng, H. The hedging effect of green bonds on carbon market risk. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 71, 101509 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gerlagh, R. & Heijmans, R. J. R. K. Climate-conscious consumers and the buy, bank, burn program. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 431–433 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ye, J. & Xue, M. Influences of sentiment from news articles on EU carbon prices. Energy Econ. 101, 105393 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • On Ancillary Activity – Market Size Calculation – Update for the Year 2020 (European Securities and Markets Authority, 2021).

  • Boyde, E. Physical carbon credit ETF wins praise despite some misgivings. Financial Times (8 November 2021).

  • Koch, N., Fuss, S., Grosjean, G. & Edenhofer, O. Causes of the EU ETS price drop: recession, CDM, renewable policies or a bit of everything? − New Evidence. Energy Policy 73, 676–685 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Friedrich, M., Fries, S., Pahle, M. & Edenhofer, O. Rules vs. discretion in cap-and-trade programs: evidence from the EU emission trading system. SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3718517 (2020).

  • Working, H. Speculation on hedging markets. Food Res. Inst. Stud. 1, 185–220 (1960).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Alquist, R. & Gervais, O. The role of financial speculation in driving the price of crude oil. Energy J. 34, 35–54 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Soares, D. B. & Borocco, E. Rational destabilization in commodity markets. J. Commod. Mark. 25, 100190 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Garcia, P., Leuthold, R. M. & Zapata, H. Lead-lag relationships between trading volume and price variability: new evidence. J. Futures Mark. 6, 1–10 (1986).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lucia, J. J. & Pardo, Á. On measuring speculative and hedging activities in futures markets from volume and open interest data. Appl. Econ. 42, 1549–1557 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lucia, J. J., Mansanet-Bataller, M. & Pardo, Á. Speculative and hedging activities in the European carbon market. Energy Policy 82, 342–351 (2015). An empirical analysis of hedging and speculation in the EU ETS based on daily trading data (volume, open interest).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cifarelli, G. & Paesani, P. Navigating the oil bubble: a non-linear heterogeneous-agent dynamic model of futures oil pricing. Energy J. 42, 101–122 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wadud, S., Durand, R. B. & Gronwald, M. Connectedness between the crude oil futures and equity markets during the pre- and post-financialisation eras. SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3892626 (2021).

  • Chevallier, J., Le Pen, Y. & Sévi, B. Options introduction and volatility in the EU ETS. Resour. Energy Econ. 33, 855–880 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stocking, A. Unintended consequences of price controls: an application to allowance markets. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 63, 120–136 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Burtraw, D., Holt, C., Palmer, K. & Shobe, W. Price-responsive allowance supply in emissions markets. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 9, 851–884 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Kim, Y. H. & Yang, J. J. What makes circuit breakers attractive to financial markets? A survey. Financ. Mark. Inst. Instrum. 13, 109–146 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yeh, C.-H. & Yang, C.-Y. Examining the effectiveness of price limits in an artificial stock market. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 34, 2089–2108 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Position Limits for Derivatives (Better Markets, 2011).

  • Shobe, W., Holt, C. & Huetteman, T. Elements of emission market design: an experimental analysis of California’s market for greenhouse gas allowances. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 107, 402–420 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Literature Review on Position Limits (CFTC, 2016).

  • Chen, T., Gao, Z., He, J., Jiang, W. & Xiong, W. Daily price limits and destructive market behavior. J. Econom. 208, 249–264 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sifat, I. M. & Mohamad, A. Circuit breakers as market stability levers: a survey of research, praxis, and challenges. Int. J. Finance Econ. 24, 1130–1169 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kachi, A. & Frerk, M. Carbon Market Oversight Primer (International Carbon Action Partnership, 2013).

  • Stefan, M. & Wellenreuther, C. London vs. Leipzig: price discovery of carbon futures during phase III of the ETS. Econ. Lett. 188, 108990 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Source link

    Related post

    Bitcoin pro traders warm up the $24K level, suggesting that the current BTC rally has legs

    Bitcoin pro traders warm up the $24K level, suggesting…

    On Feb. 1 and Feb 2. Bitcoin’s (BTC) price surpassed even the most bullish price projections after the U.S. Federal Reserve…
    Troubled Crypto Miners Get Breathing Room as Bitcoin Rebounds

    Troubled Crypto Miners Get Breathing Room as Bitcoin Rebounds

    (Bloomberg) — Rising Bitcoin prices are buying some time for distressed crypto miners as they renegotiate debt with lenders to stay…
    Financial Accounting Standards Board votes to release draft cryptocurrency in March

    Financial Accounting Standards Board votes to release draft cryptocurrency…

    The Financial Accounting Standards Board, in its Feb. 1 meeting, voted to advance its first standard on cryptocurrencies and digital assets.…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published.